Fairness you can enforce
When the platform provides the assistant, the mode is enforced in software. Every team has the same tooling, so the competition measures the students, not who owns a better subscription.
Every Haxios Learning competition runs with an AI policy the educator chooses. Two decisions: where the AI comes from, and how much it is allowed to do. The arena, the rules and the venture pitch stay the same either way.
For a first-year student learning loops, an assistant that writes the code removes the lesson. For a senior capstone team, refusing to let them use the tools every employer expects removes a different lesson. Neither policy is right for everyone, so the platform doesn't pick one.
Because the AI policy is a setting rather than a rule on paper, the same competition can run twice for two audiences. An intro section runs in AI-error mode; the advanced section runs AI-developer mode on the same arena the same week, and their scores mean what the educator intended.
When the platform provides the assistant, the mode is enforced in software. Every team has the same tooling, so the competition measures the students, not who owns a better subscription.
Deciding when to trust a suggestion, when to check it, and when to ignore it is a skill. The modes let students practice it in stages instead of all at once.
In bring-your-own mode, the choice of AI is one more technology decision the team has to defend in front of the judges. That's the same conversation industry is having right now.
Each mode draws a hard line around what the AI is allowed to do. Educators pick one per event, per class or per rule set.
Unrestricted AI usage
Guidance, never code
Only enough to get running
Self explanatory
| What the AI may do | AI-developer | AI-helper | AI-error | AI-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Write code for the student | Yes | No | No | No |
| Review code and suggest changes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Point out logic errors | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Explain unexpected output | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Point out syntax errors | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Unblock errors that stop the code running | Yes | Yes | Yes | No |
| Where the competitive edge lands | Strategy & verification | Design & debugging | Programming skill | Fundamentals |
Teams plug in whatever AI they already use and work with it directly. Chat assistants, AI-enabled editors, everything is integrated.
An AI chat and code assistant built directly into the competition website.
Any provider works with any mode. These are the combinations we reach for first.
| Audience | Provider | Mode | Why |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intro high school unit | We provide | AI-error | Everyone has the same safety net and nobody skips the learning. |
| Intermediate high school competition | We provide | AI-helper | Fair, enforced, and every team has a tutor at 10 PM. |
| College or conference event | Bring your own | AI-developer | Matches industry. Tool choice becomes part of the pitch. |
| Graded assessment or qualifier | Either | AI-off | A clean read on individual skill. |
| Before-and-after unit | We provide | AI-off then AI-developer | Students experience the difference and reflect on it. |
Tell us about your students and what you want them to walk away with. We'll recommend a provider, a mode and an arena.